Donald C. Lakeman vs. Kanetra J. Lakeman
Michael O. Flenniken vs. Randie L. Flenniken
Anna R. Loveless vs. Michael P. Loveless
David S. Cochran vs. Barbara Cochran
Brandon J. Morvant vs. MacKenzie W. Mayfield
Keith A. Forbes vs. Laura J. Forbes
Allison L. Pittman vs. Charles H. Pittman
Trevor Hailey vs. Sabrina M. Hailey
Angela M. Waechter vs. Lacy D. Waechter
Blake T. Watson vs. Sarah F. Watson
Jermaine F. Boykin vs. Amanda Boykin
Natalie G. Maples-Ingram vs. Richard D. Ingram
Paris Huggins vs. Justin Huggins
Levona L. Simpson vs. Tracy N. Simpson
Patricia Ochoa vs. Jesus G. Ochoa
Anthony N. Colon vs. Miranda M. Colon
Sean Allen vs. Lisa Allen
Caitlyn Martin vs. Dylan Martin
Serious question. Just because divorce filings appear on Case.net and are technically public record, does that really mean they should be immediately posted online for thousands of people in the community to see?
ReplyDeleteThese are real people going through extremely personal and often painful situations. In some cases, someone may be filing because they are trying to get out of a dangerous or violent relationship. Posting their name publicly the very next day can create real safety concerns.
It also feels like this type of post mainly exists to drive clicks and fuel small-town gossip rather than provide meaningful news.
If the goal is simply reporting public records, why not wait until the case is finalized instead of posting people’s names the moment they file? At that point the situation has already played out and it would be far less likely to put someone in a vulnerable position.
Just because something is public record doesn’t always mean it needs to be broadcast immediately without considering the real people behind it.
I have read the divorce postings and sometimes it keeps someone from asking about what is probably a sensitive subject. It's a way of announcing without actually announcing.
Delete